Skip to end of banner
Go to start of banner

DRAFT User Group Agenda 08-06-23

Skip to end of metadata
Go to start of metadata

You are viewing an old version of this content. View the current version.

Compare with Current View Version History

« Previous Version 5 Next »

Please find below the agenda for our next epaPRO User Group meeting

Meeting Date

8th June 2023

If there is anything you would like to add to the Agenda, please let us know before the date of Meeting

 

Agenda Items

1

Overview of last three months:

  • Publish results, submit QA - two step process

  • Assessment Centre Extensions

  • ESFA Submission Screen Improvements

  • MFA

  • Enhancements to Side Drawer

  • File Previews

  • Configurable Proctoring Services by Standard/Employer/Provider

2

Roadmap Items:-

  • risr Assess

  • Role Switching

  • Extend Notes functionality

  • Apprentice Dashboard

  • Reporting Dashboard

  • Planning Meeting Booking - Add attendees

3

Upcoming Developments for Discussion

TBC

4

Additional Discussion Points

SD-7663 - Getting issue details... STATUS Looking at fundamental changes to the Retake Review/BiL Process. We will move the locking down away from the RR, to the BiL part of the process. For elements that are booked, but not yet taken we believe the best way to manage this would be to cancel these bookings.

Question to our customers:-

Should an element with an unsubmitted result be cancelled?

  • Potentially show a warning - any bookings without results will be cancelled

  • Option to not cancel bookings when approving the RR → BiL, so that they can stay, with all of the caveats that comes with

https://covalenttech.atlassian.net/jira/servicedesk/projects/SD/queues/custom/7/SD-7381 - Appeals - who should have access in following scenario:

apprentice was previously assigned to EPAx and EPAz completed one element, however for future elements EPAx was not available, therefore the apprentice was reallocated to EPAz to complete these.

If the element which EPAx completed, was then appealed, only EPAz and any EPA Managers assigned to EPAz (the re-allocated apprentices EPA) can view the appeal, despite it being an element assigned to EPAx (not EPAz) that is being appealed.

  • Should the EPA assigned to the element even be able to see appeals against their own work?

  • If so, if the EPA assigned to the element is also the apprentice’s EPA, which should overwrite?

 

5

Update on our meeting with iFATE

  • No labels