Versions Compared

Key

  • This line was added.
  • This line was removed.
  • Formatting was changed.

Please find below the agenda for our next epaPRO User Group meeting

...

Agenda Items

1

Overview of last three months:

Tip

Last Quarter

🆕 34 Feature Requests

(blue star) 53 Bugs

Released Development in last 3 months

  • Apprentice Dashboard

  • Enhancements to Assessment Milestones

  • User Account Switching

  • Apprentice Dashboard - option to upload against milestones

  • Ofqual Reasonable Adjustments

  • Redesign of Contracts Screen

2

Roadmap Items:-

EP-3675 epaPRO Assess

EP-3804 Accolade - General Awarding

EP-4299 Assessment Elements - ability for EPAs to accept/reject

EP-4294 Assessment Booking - New Bulk/Group Process

EP-4097 Assessment Element - Cancelled status

EP-4219 Booking attendees - allow attendees to just be notified and not invited

3

Development for Discussion

Ofqual report - we need to plan this

  • Need to see if we can get a conclusive answer from Ofqual on what should be included. All components, ignoring apprentice status, what about back into learning, suspended, cancelled etc. etc.?

    • We may also need to put together a clear statement to the user group so we can try and get consensus there instead

Jira Legacy
serverSystem JIRA
serverIda2269739-3244-3b4d-bb8f-c582148d7bba
keySD-8978

 

 

4

epaPRO Assess Update

5

Additionally

  • Query from Innovate re-enabling the validation on earliest and latest registration dates (against the standard) this was initially removed in- Version 5.01.0 - 11/10/2022 ;

Jira Legacy
serverSystem JIRA
serverIda2269739-3244-3b4d-bb8f-c582148d7bba
keySD-8962

  • Question - how do we give ample opportunity for customers to feedback on new development?

We have tried various methods some with more work involved to create these than others :-

  • Sandbox

  • Clickable wireframes

  • Documented workflows

Possible option is to create a webinar of work added to sandbox and to publish this on the Knowledgebase and email to the sandbox users. Also to limit the time it is on there - so load it for 1 month - ask for feedback at end of that month, review and leave it for 1 more month and then close access down.

Order of Notes

raised by Innovate - currently these are sorted by default based on their Priority. As notes have been mainly used as a type of CRM type function beyond the original intention, we can see that customers may prefer the default to be Newest First? Would you all be ok if we amended the default sorting on this screen to be Newest rather than Highest Priority - given that there is now a filter for Importance?

6

AOB?